Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallb… scores 22.9 points higher (48.9 vs 26.0) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($3983 vs $231; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.9 | 26.0 | −46.8% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 46.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,983.28 | $231.08 | −94.2% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 94.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.44s | 49.64s | +269.3% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 269.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback): 46.8% less intelligence, 94.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 269.3% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill