Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)

Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
53.20
Total cost
$9063
Z AIGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
11.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)53.211.2−78.9% GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is 78.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$9,063.11Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)108.69s33.24s−69.4% GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is 69.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): what beats itGLM-4.6V (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-xhigh/glm-4-6v-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-xhigh/glm-4-6v-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill