Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… scores 6.9 points higher (53.2 vs 46.3) but costs 44× as much to run the benchmark ($9063 vs $207; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 46.3, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro when 46.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.2 | 46.3 | −13.0% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 13.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $9,063.11 | $206.66 | −97.7% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 97.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 77.16s | 48.29s | −37.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 37.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 13.0% less intelligence, 97.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 57.60 for $8708.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-xhigh/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-xhigh/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill