Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B

Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
53.20
Total cost
$9063
AlibabaQwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)53.26.7−87.4% Qwen2.5 Coder Instruc… is 87.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$9,063.11Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)77.16sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): what beats itQwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-xhigh/qwen2-5-coder-32b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-xhigh/qwen2-5-coder-32b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill