Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High)
Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.0 | 28.5 | −41.8% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 41.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $13,326.78 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 259.72s | 14.46s | −94.4% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 94.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill