Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)

Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
53.40
Total cost
$13129
GoogleGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)53.413.9−74.0% Gemma 4 31B (Non-reas… is 74.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$13,128.86Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)224.26s9.85s−95.6% Gemma 4 31B (Non-reas… is 95.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$0.17 / $0.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback): what beats itGemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill