Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)

Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.7 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
53.40
Total cost
$13129
Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)53.422.2−58.4% GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) is 58.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$13,128.86Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)224.39s71.38s−68.2% GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) is 68.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$0.53 / $2.10
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback): what beats itGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/glm-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/glm-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill