Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
53.40
Total cost
$13129
Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)53.422.4−58.1% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 58.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$13,128.86Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)201.53s3.83s−98.1% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 98.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback): what beats itGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/glm-5-2-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/glm-5-2-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill