Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 19.2 points higher (53.4 vs 34.2) but costs 49× as much to run the benchmark ($13129 vs $269; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 34.2, and GPT-6 Sol (Low) when 34.2 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) | GPT-6 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.4 | 34.2 | −36.0% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 36.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $13,128.86 | $268.73 | −98.0% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 98.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 201.72s | 6.34s | −96.9% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 96.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Low) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback): 36.0% less intelligence, 98.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 57.60 for $8708.
- GPT-6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)GPT-6 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/gpt-6-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/gpt-6-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill