Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 1.0 points higher (53.4 vs 52.4) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($13129 vs $5787; both flagship class). Pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Wonder (Max).
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.4 | 52.4 | −1.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 1.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $13,128.86 | $5,786.78 | −55.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 55.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 224.30s | 46.63s | −79.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 79.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback): 1.9% less intelligence, 55.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 57.60 for $8708.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill