Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… scores 43.2 points higher (61.8 vs 18.6) but costs 179× as much to run the benchmark ($7106 vs $39.6; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 18.6, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) when 18.6 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 61.8 | 18.6 | −69.9% Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is 69.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,105.77 | $39.60 | −99.4% Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is 99.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.05s | 12.43s | −65.5% Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is 65.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback): 69.9% less intelligence, 99.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.5% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/claude-haiku-5-5-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/claude-haiku-5-5-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill