Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
61.80
Total cost
$7106
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
-
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback)DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)61.8Not reported— not comparable
Total AA cost (lower is better)$7,105.77Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)36.05s17.87s−50.4% DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is 50.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$8.00 / $40.0$2.00 / $4.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback): what beats itDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/deepseek-r1-0120 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/deepseek-r1-0120?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill