Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)

Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
61.80
Total cost
$7106
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
-
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)61.8Not reported— not comparable
Total AA cost (lower is better)$7,105.77Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)36.05s68.27s+89.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 … is 89.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$8.00 / $40.0$1.31 / $3.13
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback): what beats itDeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/deepseek-v4-pro-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/deepseek-v4-pro-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill