Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6 Luna (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… scores 52.1 points higher (61.8 vs 9.7) but costs 782× as much to run the benchmark ($7106 vs $9.09; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 9.7, and GPT-6 Luna (Low) when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 61.8 | 9.7 | −84.3% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 84.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,105.77 | $9.09 | −99.9% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 99.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.05s | 7.21s | −80.0% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 80.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback): 84.3% less intelligence, 99.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback)GPT-6 Luna (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/gpt-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/gpt-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill