Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… scores 26.6 points higher (61.8 vs 35.2) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($7106 vs $4722; both flagship class). Pick Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (High).
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 61.8 | 35.2 | −43.0% Grok 4.7 (High) is 43.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,105.77 | $4,721.61 | −33.6% Grok 4.7 (High) is 33.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.05s | 46.50s | +29.0% Grok 4.7 (High) is 29.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback): 43.0% less intelligence, 33.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 29.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) scores 56.40 for $3360.
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill