Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… scores 42.9 points higher (61.8 vs 18.9) but costs 8.1× as much to run the benchmark ($7106 vs $878; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 18.9, and MiniMax-M3 when 18.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 61.8 | 18.9 | −69.4% MiniMax-M3 is 69.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,105.77 | $878.03 | −87.6% MiniMax-M3 is 87.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.25s | 19.17s | −45.6% MiniMax-M3 is 45.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback): 69.4% less intelligence, 87.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback)MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill