Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) vs Mistral Large 4 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Mistral Large 4 (High) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… scores 35.7 points higher (61.8 vs 26.1) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($7106 vs $1360; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 26.1, and Mistral Large 4 (High) when 26.1 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) | Mistral Large 4 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 61.8 | 26.1 | −57.8% Mistral Large 4 (High) is 57.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,105.77 | $1,359.61 | −80.9% Mistral Large 4 (High) is 80.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.25s | 20.68s | −41.3% Mistral Large 4 (High) is 41.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 (High) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback): 57.8% less intelligence, 80.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.3% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Large 4 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-high/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill