Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) scores 23.4 points higher (53.9 vs 30.5) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($2862 vs $213; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 30.5, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 30.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.9 | 30.5 | −43.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 43.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,861.78 | $213.33 | −92.5% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 92.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.73s | 7.58s | −65.1% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 65.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback): 43.4% less intelligence, 92.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.1% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-low/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-low/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill