Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) scores 36.5 points higher (53.9 vs 17.4) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2862 vs $1764; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3 (Low).
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.9 | 17.4 | −67.7% Kimi K3 (Low) is 67.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,861.78 | $1,763.52 | −38.4% Kimi K3 (Low) is 38.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.94s | 56.42s | +126.2% Kimi K3 (Low) is 126.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback): 67.7% less intelligence, 38.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 126.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-low/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-low/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill