Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) scores 35.0 points higher (53.9 vs 18.9) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2862 vs $878; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 18.9, and MiniMax-M3 when 18.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.9 | 18.9 | −64.9% MiniMax-M3 is 64.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,861.78 | $878.03 | −69.3% MiniMax-M3 is 69.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.94s | 19.17s | −23.1% MiniMax-M3 is 23.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback): 64.9% less intelligence, 69.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 23.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback)MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-low/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-low/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill