Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Muse Wonder (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Wonder (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback)
Muse Wonder (High) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback): 24.9% less intelligence, 23.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) | Muse Wonder (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.9 | 40.5 | −24.9% Muse Wonder (High) is 24.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,861.78 | $3,520.18 | +23.0% Muse Wonder (High) is 23.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 22.57s | 31.80s | +40.9% Muse Wonder (High) is 40.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- Muse Wonder (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) scores 56.40 for $3360.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Low, Default Fallback)Muse Wonder (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-low/muse-wonder-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-low/muse-wonder-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill