Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallb… scores 50.2 points higher (56.4 vs 6.2) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($3360 vs $224; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 6.2, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 6.2 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.4 | 6.2 | −89.0% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 89.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,359.66 | $224.32 | −93.3% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 93.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.35s | 6.22s | −78.1% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 78.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.25 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback): 89.0% less intelligence, 93.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.1% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-medium/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-medium/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill