Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6 Luna (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallb… scores 35.0 points higher (56.4 vs 21.4) but costs 54× as much to run the benchmark ($3360 vs $62.6; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 21.4, and GPT-6 Luna (High) when 21.4 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.4 | 21.4 | −62.1% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 62.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,359.66 | $62.58 | −98.1% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 98.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.53s | 23.19s | −15.8% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 15.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (High) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback): 62.1% less intelligence, 98.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 15.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback)GPT-6 Luna (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-medium/gpt-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-medium/gpt-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill