Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallb… scores 26.5 points higher (56.4 vs 29.9) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($3360 vs $221; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 29.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro when 29.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.4 | 29.9 | −47.0% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 47.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,359.66 | $220.73 | −93.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 93.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.35s | 47.52s | +67.6% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 67.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback): 47.0% less intelligence, 93.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-medium/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-medium/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill