Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallb… scores 31.1 points higher (56.4 vs 25.3) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($3360 vs $2923; both flagship class). Pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallb… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Large 4 Preview.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.4 | 25.3 | −55.1% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 55.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,359.66 | $2,923.39 | −13.0% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 13.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.35s | 20.00s | −29.5% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 29.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback): 55.1% less intelligence, 13.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 29.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-medium/mistral-large-4-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-medium/mistral-large-4-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill