Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallb… scores 42.8 points higher (56.4 vs 13.6) but costs 7.5× as much to run the benchmark ($3360 vs $447; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 13.6, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 13.6 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.4 | 13.6 | −75.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 75.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,359.66 | $447.06 | −86.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 86.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.53s | 9.41s | −65.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 65.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.17 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback): 75.9% less intelligence, 86.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.8% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-medium/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-medium/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill