Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… scores 4.8 points higher (62.2 vs 57.4) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($11742 vs $4766; both flagship class). Pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac….
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 62.2 | 57.4 | −7.7% Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhig… is 7.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $11,741.62 | $4,765.91 | −59.4% Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhig… is 59.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.03s | 135.21s | +32.5% Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhig… is 32.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 7.7% less intelligence, 59.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 32.5% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill