Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… scores 39.1 points higher (62.2 vs 23.1) but costs 8.4× as much to run the benchmark ($11742 vs $1402; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 23.1, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when 23.1 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 62.2 | 23.1 | −62.9% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 62.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $11,741.62 | $1,401.88 | −88.1% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 88.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.03s | 32.16s | −68.5% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 68.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 62.9% less intelligence, 88.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 68.5% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/deepseek-v4-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/deepseek-v4-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill