Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… scores 27.4 points higher (62.2 vs 34.8) but costs 49× as much to run the benchmark ($11742 vs $238; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 34.8, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when 34.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 62.2 | 34.8 | −44.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 44.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $11,741.62 | $237.91 | −98.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 98.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.03s | 12.21s | −88.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 88.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 44.1% less intelligence, 98.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/gpt-6-1-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/gpt-6-1-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill