Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… scores 9.7 points higher (62.2 vs 52.5) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($11742 vs $718; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 52.5, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when 52.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 62.2 | 52.5 | −15.6% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 15.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $11,741.62 | $717.71 | −93.9% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 93.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.03s | 174.61s | +71.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 71.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 15.6% less intelligence, 93.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill