Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… scores 31.1 points higher (62.2 vs 31.1) but costs 5.4× as much to run the benchmark ($11742 vs $2169; both flagship class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 31.1, and Grok 4.7 (Low) when 31.1 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 62.2 | 31.1 | −50.0% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 50.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $11,741.62 | $2,168.65 | −81.5% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 81.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.03s | 15.94s | −84.4% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 84.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 50.0% less intelligence, 81.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2-xhigh/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill