Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 7.2 points higher (64.6 vs 57.4) but costs 4.7× as much to run the benchmark ($22191 vs $4766; both flagship class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 57.4, and Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… when 57.4 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 64.6 | 57.4 | −11.1% Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhig… is 11.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $22,191.42 | $4,765.91 | −78.5% Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhig… is 78.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 258.66s | 177.18s | −31.5% Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhig… is 31.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback): 11.1% less intelligence, 78.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.5% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill