Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)

Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
64.60
Total cost
$22191
Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
-
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)64.6Not reported— not comparable
Total AA cost (lower is better)$22,191.42Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)258.66s71.56s−72.3% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 72.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$8.00 / $40.0$0.55 / $2.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback): what beats itGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/glm-4-6-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/glm-4-6-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill