Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5 nano (High)

Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5 nano (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
64.60
Total cost
$22191
OpenAIGPT-5 nano (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
-
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)GPT-5 nano (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)64.6Not reported— not comparable
Total AA cost (lower is better)$22,191.42Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)258.66s64.14s−75.2% GPT-5 nano (High) is 75.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$8.00 / $40.0$0.05 / $0.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback): what beats itGPT-5 nano (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/gpt-5-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/gpt-5-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill