Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 14.3 points higher (64.6 vs 50.3) but costs 39× as much to run the benchmark ($22191 vs $573; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 50.3, and GPT-6.1 Sol (High) when 50.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 64.6 | 50.3 | −22.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 22.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $22,191.42 | $573.17 | −97.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 97.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 258.66s | 77.66s | −70.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 70.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback): 22.1% less intelligence, 97.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/gpt-6-1-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/gpt-6-1-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill