Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 28.6 points higher (64.6 vs 36.0) but costs 189× as much to run the benchmark ($22191 vs $117; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 36.0, and Muse Ember (Max) when 36.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 64.6 | 36.0 | −44.3% Muse Ember (Max) is 44.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $22,191.42 | $117.12 | −99.5% Muse Ember (Max) is 99.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Max) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback): 44.3% less intelligence, 99.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill