Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Muse Wonder (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Wonder (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 24.1 points higher (64.6 vs 40.5) but costs 6.3× as much to run the benchmark ($22191 vs $3520; both flagship class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 40.5, and Muse Wonder (High) when 40.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) | Muse Wonder (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 64.6 | 40.5 | −37.3% Muse Wonder (High) is 37.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $22,191.42 | $3,520.18 | −84.1% Muse Wonder (High) is 84.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 258.66s | 31.44s | −87.8% Muse Wonder (High) is 87.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (High) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback): 37.3% less intelligence, 84.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Wonder (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) scores 56.40 for $3360.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)Muse Wonder (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/muse-wonder-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/muse-wonder-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill