Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) by Anthropic or Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)
Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback): 8.1% more intelligence, 80.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 53.6 | +8.1% Claude Opus 5.5 (High… is 8.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $11,160.86 | $2,172.43 | −80.5% Claude Opus 5.5 (High… is 80.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 71.92s | 33.81s | −53.0% Claude Opus 5.5 (High… is 53.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 57.60 for $8708.
- Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback)Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/claude-opus-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/claude-opus-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill