Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) scores 8.7 points higher (49.6 vs 40.9) but costs 6.9× as much to run the benchmark ($11161 vs $1623; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) when you need intelligence above 40.9, and Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when 40.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 40.9 | −17.5% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 17.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $11,160.86 | $1,622.73 | −85.5% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 85.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 71.92s | 33.13s | −53.9% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Hig… is 53.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.75 / $3.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback): 17.5% less intelligence, 85.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.9% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 57.60 for $8708.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/gemini-3-8-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/gemini-3-8-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill