Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
49.60
Total cost
$11161
Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback)GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)49.614.9−70.0% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 70.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$11,160.86Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)85.37s19.63s−77.0% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 77.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$0.57 / $2.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback): what beats itGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/glm-4-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/glm-4-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill