Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)

Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback)GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)49.614.9−70.0% GLM-4.7-Flash (Reason… is 70.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$11,160.86Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)85.37s30.94s−63.8% GLM-4.7-Flash (Reason… is 63.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$0.07 / $0.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/glm-4-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/glm-4-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill