Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GLM-5 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback)GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)49.621.8−56.0% GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) is 56.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$11,160.86Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)85.62s9.03s−89.5% GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) is 89.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$1.00 / $3.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/glm-5-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/glm-5-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill