Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) scores 23.6 points higher (49.6 vs 26.0) but costs 48× as much to run the benchmark ($11161 vs $231; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 26.0 | −47.6% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 47.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $11,160.86 | $231.08 | −97.9% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 97.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 85.37s | 49.64s | −41.9% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 41.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback): 47.6% less intelligence, 97.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.9% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 57.60 for $8708.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill