Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct

Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
49.60
Total cost
$11161
Allen Institute for AIOlmo 3.1 32B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback)Olmo 3.1 32B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)49.66.5−86.9% Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct is 86.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$11,160.86Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)85.37sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback): what beats itOlmo 3.1 32B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill