Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 13.8% less intelligence, 4388.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 36.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 32.6 | −13.8% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 13.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $4,222.12 | +4388.3% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 45× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.02s | 16.65s | −36.0% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 36.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.50 / $9.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gemini-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gemini-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill