Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) scores 11.8 points higher (49.6 vs 37.8) but costs 26× as much to run the benchmark ($2434 vs $94.1; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium) when you need intelligence above 37.8, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) when 37.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 49.6 | +31.2% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 31.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $2,434.12 | +2487.6% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 26× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.02s | 14.16s | −51.2% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 51.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 31.2% more intelligence, 2487.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)GPT-6 Astra (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gpt-6-astra-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gpt-6-astra-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill