Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs GPT-6 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Max) scores 9.8 points higher (47.6 vs 37.8) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($1536 vs $94.1; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 37.8, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) when 37.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | GPT-6 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 47.6 | +25.9% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 25.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $1,535.80 | +1532.6% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 16× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.02s | 87.14s | +234.9% GPT-6 Sol (Max) is 234.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Max) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 25.9% more intelligence, 1532.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 234.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)GPT-6 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gpt-6-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gpt-6-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill