Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 31.7% less intelligence, 955.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 25.8 | −31.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 31.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $992.88 | +955.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.38s | 43.10s | +51.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 51.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill