Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 28.5 points higher (37.8 vs 9.3) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($94.1 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Maverick.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 9.3 | −75.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 75.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $43.98 | −53.2% Llama 4 Maverick is 53.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.02s | 10.42s | −64.1% Llama 4 Maverick is 64.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 75.4% less intelligence, 53.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill