Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 0.6 points higher (38.4 vs 37.8) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $94.1; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 37.8, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) when 37.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 38.4 | +1.6% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 1.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $1,607.86 | +1609.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 17× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.02s | 27.12s | +4.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 4.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 1.6% more intelligence, 1609.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill